Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 257 | Next |
|
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
All (PDF)
|
This page
All
|
Name Address Dear October 10, 1990 Howard Nankin has informed me that the election of two members of the Nominations Committee called for in the By-Laws should be on the ballot with the Vice President and Council positions. I have discussed with him and with the members of the Nominations Committee the procedure we should utilize. It has been suggested and I strongly agree that the Nominations Committee will be best served by having membership in part which has had experience being on the Council. Thus, we propose to nominate the four members of Council whose terms expire at the end of the year of the election. This procedure does not require full Council approval or addition to the By-Laws to be implemented, although in the future the Council may want to formalize the procedure more so. I would like to ask you to consent to have your name placed in nomination for election to the Nominations Committee for 1991-92. Please indicate your acceptance for this nomination on the enclosed list of nominations and return it to me. I will require a brief biographical sketch to be included with the ballot. Please send this to me prior to November 1, 1990 if possible. Before final preparation of the ballot, I would also like your review and comments of the Nominations for Council and Vice President. We were very fortunate to have acceptances for nomination from 10 of the first 12 members who were contacted. The preferential list of nominees was prepared from a list of suggestions received by the membership and by the members of the Nominations Committee. The choice of candidates who would run for the same positions was made from a tally of suggestions made by members of the Committee. Since the outcome of the election is dependent both upon the qualifications of the nominee and also upon the choice between qualified candidates, the Committee believes that the pairing of candidates should represent a consensus, not the judgement of the Chairman. I fully agree since this was my suggestion. I am very pleased with the continuing quality of the members of the Society who are willing to contribute to the work of its maintenance and growth.
Object Description
Title | Annual Meeting of the American Society of Andrology 1990 |
Subject |
American Society of Andrology Scientific societies Correspondance Biography files Reports Minutes Agendas Membership lists Fliers (printed matter) Newsletters |
Description | Includes correspondence, biographical sketches of candidates, officer and committee reports, minutes, agenda, officer and committee member lists, social event fliers, Journal of Andrology manuscript submission information, and newsletters. |
Creator | American Society of Andrology |
Date | 1990 |
Type [DCMI Type] | Text |
Collection | American Society of Andrology Records, 1975-ongoing;http://findingaids.lib.iastate.edu/spcl/manuscripts/MS410.html |
Location | Iowa State University Library Special Collections and University Archives; http://archives.lib.iastate.edu/ |
Call Number | MS 0410 |
Format-Medium |
Manuscript: 257 pages 22 x 28 cm |
Identifier | 0410.Andrology.006-20 |
Rights | U.S. and international copyright laws protect this digital image. Commercial use or distribution of the image is not permitted without prior permission of the copyright holder. For permission to use the digital image, please contact Iowa State University Library Special Collections and University Archives at archives@iastate.edu For reproductions see: http://archives.lib.iastate.edu/using-our-materials/making-copies/photographs-and-documents |
Format | |
File Size | 7347723 Bytes |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Collection | American Society of Andrology Records, 1975-ongoing;http://findingaids.lib.iastate.edu/spcl/manuscripts/MS410.html |
Transcription | Name Address Dear October 10, 1990 Howard Nankin has informed me that the election of two members of the Nominations Committee called for in the By-Laws should be on the ballot with the Vice President and Council positions. I have discussed with him and with the members of the Nominations Committee the procedure we should utilize. It has been suggested and I strongly agree that the Nominations Committee will be best served by having membership in part which has had experience being on the Council. Thus, we propose to nominate the four members of Council whose terms expire at the end of the year of the election. This procedure does not require full Council approval or addition to the By-Laws to be implemented, although in the future the Council may want to formalize the procedure more so. I would like to ask you to consent to have your name placed in nomination for election to the Nominations Committee for 1991-92. Please indicate your acceptance for this nomination on the enclosed list of nominations and return it to me. I will require a brief biographical sketch to be included with the ballot. Please send this to me prior to November 1, 1990 if possible. Before final preparation of the ballot, I would also like your review and comments of the Nominations for Council and Vice President. We were very fortunate to have acceptances for nomination from 10 of the first 12 members who were contacted. The preferential list of nominees was prepared from a list of suggestions received by the membership and by the members of the Nominations Committee. The choice of candidates who would run for the same positions was made from a tally of suggestions made by members of the Committee. Since the outcome of the election is dependent both upon the qualifications of the nominee and also upon the choice between qualified candidates, the Committee believes that the pairing of candidates should represent a consensus, not the judgement of the Chairman. I fully agree since this was my suggestion. I am very pleased with the continuing quality of the members of the Society who are willing to contribute to the work of its maintenance and growth. |